Docklands Solicitor
Latest legal news from Docklands Solicitors, Kaslers Solicitors LLP.
Monday, 26 January 2009
Agency workers and continous service
· works though, and is paid by, an agency for X months at a client
· then joins the client and works for Y months
· and is then dismissed
How many months continuous employment does the employee have - X months? Or X+Y months?
It is important because the employee does not acquire the right to be unfairly dismissed until he has clocked up 12 months continuous service.
In several 2008 cases, the
· employer argued for X months only and
· employee argued that there existed an implied employee contract with the client so that the period of continuous employment was X + Y months
The Courts have now said that where an agency contract is genuinely in place, then there is no need to imply a contract between the agency employee and the client (“an implied contract”), especially where there is no need to do so
This means that the Tribunal should now consider whether the client
· could (or did on occasions) refuse to accept a different employee
· guaranteed work throughout the period of contract
· paid the employee when work did not take place
If he could or did do these things, then this points towards an implied contract - otherwise not
Labels: agency worker continuous services employment contract
Subscribe to Posts [Atom]
Archives
- October 2008
- November 2008
- December 2008
- January 2009
- February 2009
- March 2009
- April 2009
- May 2009
- June 2009
- July 2009
- August 2009
- September 2009
- October 2009
- November 2009
- December 2009
- January 2010
- March 2010
- April 2010
- May 2010
- June 2010
- July 2010
- August 2010
- September 2010
- October 2010
- December 2010
- January 2011
- February 2011
- March 2011
- April 2011
- May 2011
- June 2011
- July 2011
- August 2011
- September 2011
- November 2011
- December 2011